President Obama is not one new to criticism. Everything from his politics to the color of his skin to his parentage has attracted much anger from the public. Generally, the criticisms of Obama that gain the most attention are from the stereotypical radicals who believe that Obama is a secret Muslim who has a hidden Marxist/socialist agenda. Let me just say that there are two things I find incredibly absurd about this. First, the amount of attention the media gives these people and second, the idea in itself.
It is really a shame that so much of the “criticism” of the President comes from prejudice and radical partisanship; people who would do anything to attack the other side to make themselves seen in a better light. I know that the cornerstone of politics is sucker punches and backstabbing but basic policy analysis needs more attention, especially from these “hard news” programs. (MSNBC, CNN, New York Times, and Fox all have biases in case you were thinking that it was only Fox. The former few are just more clever at hiding it.)
Yet another scandal emerged this week in Washington. Barack Obama’s administration were accused of hacking into emails and phone calls of the Associated Press in order to check that no ‘confidential’ information got into public hands. On Thursday, Obama himself said that he would make ‘no apologies’ for the actions of the administration, citing his duty as commander-in-chief to protect national secrets and guard against the nation’s enemies. Continue reading
In a previous post I discussed how the fiscal multiplier is less than one, in a nutshell this means that ‘Stimulus’ spending does not help the economy, at best it saves pain up for later and pays it out, quite literally, with interest in time.
But it is not this crushing destruction of tax and spend economics, nor the morality of piling up debt in the present for our children and children’s children to pay for in the future that I want to look at here, I wanted to discuss ‘Trickle Down Theory’ Continue reading
“If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that, too.” – Somerset Maugham
If you haven’t been reading my work for the last year and couple months, you know that I’ve been discussing the spectre of Sequestration for a while now. It’s become quite popular, suddenly, but amazingly, not a peep about it was discussed by either candidate in the entire run up to the election. Continue reading
These are the facts.
The US government claims the right to assassinate its own citizens.
The president doesn’t have to be the one to give the order; it can be any high-ranking official. You don’t have to be an imminent threat to merit assassination; simply joining, or being suspected of joining, our enemies is enough. Capture does not have to be infeasible. Even if Obama could easily capture you and try you before a court, he claims he has no obligation to do so. Continue reading
Sign up for The Libertarian Newsletter